Democracy Erosion: Tech and Totalitarianism

GOP government pressure on Big Tech to suppress transparency tools and the targeted harassment of academics, shows a dangerous path away from democracy toward a techno-plutocracy and, ultimately, a totalitarian state.  The core concern is the administration’s active efforts to control the flow of information and eliminate checks on its power.

Controlling Information, Silencing Dissent

When the Department of Justice (DOJ) demands that companies like Apple and Google remove apps like Eyes Up and Red Dot, they are trying to eliminate evidence and community oversight of agencies like ICE. These apps were designed to document and preserve evidence of abuses of power by law enforcement—a vital function in a free society.

  • Apple complied with the DOJ’s request, classifying ICE officials as a “targeted group” protected from “objectionable content,” effectively treating evidence of potential misconduct as hate speech.
  • Google followed suit, creating a “domino effect” that stifles digital organizing.

This dynamic shows a powerful union between state authority and the few corporations that control the digital public square. This is the sign of the growing tech-plutocracy, where corporate power (Apple, Google, etc.) is weaponized by the state to enforce political control, prioritizing the protection of state agents over citizens.  The government’s filming of its own ICE operations, set to “action movie music,” further proves this is a fight for narrative control. They don’t appear embarrassed; they seek to control the image and narrative by suppressing independent accounts.

Weaponizing Fear, Redefining Law

The targeting of academic Mark Bray, an expert on anti-fascist movements, exemplifies the government’s use of manufactured threats to justify actions and suppress dissent.

  • Trump’s declaration of Antifa as a domestic terrorist organization provided the pretense.
  • Far-right influencers and groups like Turning Point USA then launched a doxing and harassment campaign against Bray, forcing him to leave the country.

This action uses an expansive, undefined threat (“Antifa”) to justify:

  1. Chilling Academic Freedom: Harassing a non-affiliated professor who merely studies a movement.
  2. State Intimidation: Bray was searched and interrogated by federal customs agents at the airport despite no accusation of a crime. This demonstrates how state power uses the specter of domestic terrorism to intimidate political opponents and researchers.

This is the essence of a move toward totalitarianism: erasing the distinction between research/criticism and criminal activity. When the state dictates what information is permissible and what dissent is punishable, the foundations of democracy crumble.

The Evolution to Totalitarianism

The concentration of surveillance technology and the suppression of counter-surveillance tools (like Eyes Up and Red Dot) in the hands of the state, backed by Big Tech, creates a feedback loop for control.

The current administration isn’t just seeking obedience; it is building a system where the technological infrastructure of daily life (app stores, social media platforms) enforces its political will. This merger of unaccountable state force (ICE, DOJ) with centralized corporate platforms (Apple, Google) furthers the evolution of society into a tech-plutocracy, a short step from full totalitarianism. Action is required to safeguard the right to document, organize, and dissent before this technological noose tightens permanently.